Gait Knee » History » Version 21
Aníta Björk Hlynsdóttir, 2012-01-24 11:45
| 1 | 1 | Árni Þorvaldsson | h1. Gait Knee |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2 | |||
| 3 | 21 | Aníta Björk Hlynsdóttir | h2. Group members: |
| 4 | * Sæþór, Árni, Aníta og Viktoría |
||
| 5 | 1 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 6 | |||
| 7 | *stance phase* 60% |
||
| 8 | flexion-extension-flexion |
||
| 9 | |||
| 10 | *swing phase* 40% |
||
| 11 | extension |
||
| 12 | |||
| 13 | |||
| 14 | |||
| 15 | *initial contact* |
||
| 16 | 2 | Sæþór Ólafur Pétursson | extension (-2 to 5°flexion) |
| 17 | -The knee can be hyperextended to -2° |
||
| 18 | •This means that the knee has to have a convertible knee joint wich can variate from 4° to -2° |
||
| 19 | 1 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 20 | by keeping knee extended we keep stability |
||
| 21 | |||
| 22 | *loading response* |
||
| 23 | flexion (15°) |
||
| 24 | shock absorption |
||
| 25 | 2 | Sæþór Ólafur Pétursson | -The center of gravity changes. The weight is changed to the leg which the individual is going to use. |
| 26 | •The knee need to handle the weight so the knee does not collapse. |
||
| 27 | 1 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 28 | *mid stance* |
||
| 29 | 5°increased flexion, then extends to 12°flexion |
||
| 30 | to keep stability |
||
| 31 | |||
| 32 | *terminal stance* |
||
| 33 | completion of extension, then flexion starts again at the end. |
||
| 34 | |||
| 35 | *pre swing* |
||
| 36 | flexion(up to 40°) |
||
| 37 | to prepare for the swing |
||
| 38 | 2 | Sæþór Ólafur Pétursson | |
| 39 | 1 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 40 | *swing* |
||
| 41 | extension |
||
| 42 | |||
| 43 | 12 | Árni Þorvaldsson | *else* |
| 44 | 13 | Árni Þorvaldsson | * people with prostetics have more knee flexion |
| 45 | 12 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 46 | 17 | Árni Þorvaldsson | *implementation* |
| 47 | 19 | Árni Þorvaldsson | * simple hince joint. |
| 48 | * Power for the motors |
||
| 49 | >* because the robot is stationary the easiest way is to get the power into the knee is from a power cable. |
||
| 50 | >* we have to be able to unplugge the power from the knee easily. |
||
| 51 | 17 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 52 | |||
| 53 | 18 | Árni Þorvaldsson | >*must have* |
| 54 | >* hinge joint |
||
| 55 | > > * 2motors (flexion and extension) |
||
| 56 | > > * 2 degrees of freedom |
||
| 57 | >* strong build, must be able to carry weight. |
||
| 58 | >* easy to remove and put on, same system as with össur. |
||
| 59 | >* sensor for angular postion (gyro sensor |
||
| 60 | >* acceleration sensor |
||
| 61 | 1 | Árni Þorvaldsson | |
| 62 | |||
| 63 | 18 | Árni Þorvaldsson | >*good to have* |
| 64 | >* rotation in the knee |
||
| 65 | >* force sensor |
||
| 66 | > >* there has to be some rotation in the knee, otherwise it would be torque in the joint. |
||
| 67 | > >* easiest to have the rotation below the knee |
||
| 68 | 20 | Sæþór Ólafur Pétursson | |
| 69 | Calculations. |
||
| 70 | Max torque in the knee with a 120kg load at 40° is 405 Nm. So the motor need to handle that kinda torque |